Mel P in 2005 vs Mel P in 2011

Here is Mel P writing on her blog in 2005 about why it is right to have incitement to racial hatred laws but not incitement to religious hatred laws:

“Attacking people on account of their race is to attack what they are. Attacking people on account of their religion is to attack what they think. The former is an uncivilised attack on our common humanity. The latter is an integral part of debate in a liberal democracy.”

Here is Mel P in 2011:

“…the moral depravity of the Arabs is finding a grotesque echo in the moral bankruptcy and worse of the British and American ‘liberal’ media…To the New York Times, it’s not the Arab massacre of a Jewish family which has jeopardised ‘peace prospects’ — because the Israelis will quite rightly never trust any agreement with such savages — but instead Israeli policy on building more homes, on land to which it is legally and morally entitled, which is responsible instead for making peace elusive. Twisted, and sick.”

An “uncivilised attack on our common humanity”…I couldn’t have worded it better myself.

Update: Here is Mel P writing in 2006 in support of the imprisonment of David Irving:

“For the issue raised by the Irving case is not one of freedom of speech. It is incitement of racial hatred…Context is everything. Irving’s statements are not a simple matter of gross historical error. They are not even merely an expression of prejudice. They are an active incitement to hatred of the Jews.”

This entry was posted in Extremism and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Mel P in 2005 vs Mel P in 2011

  1. Steven Green says:

    Nice own goal Inayat – I really hope that the PCC and the Police do launch a big investigation and then the denizens of this benighted country will see what you fifth columnists are all about. Oh and didn’t you once use some pretty inflammatory language about one Salman Rushdie – something about death being too good for him? Was that incitement to murder perhaps? Hmm it seems its always one rule for muslims and another for the kafirs huh?

  2. Hi Steven: I wonder if you would have reacted in the same manner if someone had written about ‘the moral depravity of the Jews’ and described them as ‘savages’?

  3. Steven Green says:

    I see you’ve avoided answering the question regarding double standards. In relation to your point about describing Jews as savages etc – go find me a Jew who stabbed a 3 month old baby in the heart twice, go and find me a community of Jews who then celebrated this depraved act by handing out sweets, go and find me some Jews who behead hostages and then post the footage on the internet, go and find me some Jews who fly planes into skyscrapers wiping out 3000 people, go and find me the Jews who keep the likes of Mein Kampf and The Protocols of the Elders of Zion in the best seller lists, go and find me the Jews who murdered 30,000 of their own people as Assad did to the people of Hama. When you have then you can call the Jews savage – until then I’d take a long hard look at the Arab Middle East and ask yourself what on earth the rest of the world has done to deserve them.

    • Amin says:

      Muhammad Al Durrah – killing a 12 year old boy. Or how about the recent killings of unamrmed protesters including a child.

  4. amishmash says:

    The far leftist communist liberal Westerners and Islamic Jihadists, mainly in Britain, already said it and even in more decisive and malicious proverbs against Israel and the Jews. Did any of them was invited to be investigated by the PCC & police? Did the “liberal” media criticize them?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.